SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MAHADEVA SAHU @ MAHADEV SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['NIRANJAN HOTA', '', 'S K DWIBEDI', 'R K MAHANTA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No. 329 of 2021

Mahadeva Sahu @

Mahadev Sahu

&.

Petitioner

Mr. Niranjan Hota, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

&.

Opp. Party

Mr. P.B. Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

Order No.

ORDER

22.04.2021

03.

1.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in

connection with G.R. Case No.91 of 2020 arising out of

Bolangir Town P.S. Case No.34 of 2020 pending in the Court of

learned S.D.J.M., Bolangir for offences punishable under

section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25 and 27 of

the Arms Act.

4.

The petitioner moved an application for bail before the

Court of learned Sessions Judge, Bolangir which was rejected

on 15.12.2020.

5.

Considering the submission made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in judicial

// 2 //

Page 2 of 2

custody since

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top