IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

R.S.A. No.101 of 2010

Bunduli Putel @ Guduria & Others ….

Appellants

M/s.G. Mishra, Sr. Advocate

-versus-

Kamadev Rana & Others

….

Respondents

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE D.DASH

Order No.

ORDER

03.12.2021

I.A. No.717 of 2019

07.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement

(virtual/physical mode).

2.

This is an application for grant of time to file the

applications for substitution of the legal representatives of the

deceased Respondent No.1

3.

Learned counsel for the Appellants does not want to

press this application in view of filing of the applications for

substitution of the legal representatives of Respondent No.1 by

setting aside the abatement and condoning the delay numbered

as I.A. Nos.798,799 and 800 of 2019.

4.

Accordingly, the I.A. stands dismissed.

(D. Dash)

Judge

Order No.

// 2 //

08.

1.

Order

No.

ORDER

03.12.2021

I.A. Nos.798,799 & 800 of 2019

08.

1.

These Appellants, by filing these Applications, have

prayed for substitution of the legal representatives of

Respondent No.1 by setting aside condoning the delay.

2.

Heard.

3.

Considering the submissions made and on going

through the averments taken in the Applications; the prayers as

advanced are allowed.

4.

Accordingly, the legal representatives of Respondent

No.1 as indicated in the schedule of the plaint is allowed in

setting aside the abatement and condoning the delay and they

are arraigned as Respondent Nos.1(a), 1(b) and 1(c).

5.

Accordingly the order is carried out.

6.

The I.As. are accordingly disposed of.‘

(D. Dash)

Judge

of

Resp

onde

nt

No.1

by

set

Order

No.

ORDER

03.12.2021

R.S.A. No.101 of 2010

09.

1.

On consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the

matter is taken up for hearing on admission.

2.

Judgement is passed as per separate sheet enclosed.

(D. Dash)

Judge

H