ORISSA HIGH COURT
NILACHAKRA CONSTN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
Page 1 of 5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARBA No.05 of 2014
(Through Hybrid mode)
Nilachakra Constructions
….
Appellant
Mr. Santanu Kumar Sarangi, Senior Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and another
….
Respondents
Mr. Tarun Kumar Pattanaik, Advocate
(Additional Standing Counsel)
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
ORDER
11.08.2022
09.
1.
This appeal was moved on 14th July, 2022, when it was
contended on behalf of appellant that price variation claim
under contract clause 44.2 awarded, was erroneously set aside
in the challenge. On behalf of respondent, impugned judgment
dated 20th January, 2014 was defended on contention that in
award dated 3rd October, 2009 itself there was record of
upward
revision
of
estimated
contract
value
from
Rs.1,54,90,884/- to Rs.1,75,44,698/-.
2.
Mr. Sarangi, learned senior advocate appears on behalf
of appellant and had earlier pointed out, upward revision of
value of contract was on account of deviation.
3.
Mr. Pattnaik, learned advocate, Additional Standing
Counsel submits, appellant had given clear undertaking of ‘no
cl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.