SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
LAXMI NARAYAN PANDA – Appellant
Versus
OLIC LTD – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S LALATENDU SAMANTARAY', '', 'J SAMANTARAY', 'G DAS', 'R L PRDHAN', 'M/S BIGYAN KUMAR SHARMA', '', 'S PALAI', 'S K SINGH', 'A U SENAPATI']

W.P.(C) No.10708 of 2017

14.07.2017

Heard Mr. L. Samantaray, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.K. Sharma, learn

ed Standing Counsel for the Corporation.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition to quash the order of transfer dated 01.06

.2017 under Annexure-2. He further prays for a direction to allow him to continue as In-Charge

Assistant Engineer at L.I. Sub-Division Jajpur Road.

Mr. L. Samantaray, learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to Annexure

-2 dated 01.06.2017, the petitioner, who is a Junior Engineer (Civil) and working as I/C Assis

tant Engineer (C) L.I. Sub-Division, Jajpur Road under L.I. Division, has been transferred and

posted in L.I. Section Marshaghai under L.I. Division, Kendrapara. At the outset, it is conte

nded that the petitioner has no grievance against the order of his transfer, but his grievance

is with regard to his posting at L.I. Section Marshaghai under L.I. Division, Kendrapara. It

is stated that the petitioner has requisite qualification and he is working as in-charge Assis

tant Engineer. Therefore, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the authority to transfer hi

m to the similar post w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top