ORISSA HIGH COURT
ANANTA CH.PATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
21. 03.03.2021 1. Heard Mr. H.N. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the Petitioners
and Mr. S. Palit, learned Additional Government Advocate for
the State-Opposite Parties.
2. The Petitioners have approached this Court to recognize
<Sabar, Nalua Sabar, Kela Sabar community persons in the
Scheduled Tribe (ST) category.
3. In the reply filed by Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2, it is pointed
out that in ST list for Odisha, there is no community notified as
<Sabar=, which has synonyms like <Kela=, <Nalua Kela= and
<Nalua Sabar=. Rather <Kela= and <Nalua Kela= are notified as
Scheduled Castes (SC) at Sl. No.45 of the SC list of Odisha.
There is no community notified as <Nalua Sabar=.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners contended that in the list
of STs notified under the Orissa Caste Certificate (SC & ST)
Rules, <Sabar= was included at Sl. No.60.
5. However, from the counter affidavit filed by Opposite Party
Nos.1 and 2, it is seen that as per the Presidential Order of 1950
for the STs titled 8The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order,
1950 published in the Gazette of India on 6th September, 19509
under S.R.O. 510, the STs relating to State of Odis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.