SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
GUDLA UMA MAHESWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S G K MISHRA', '', 'G N MISHRA', 'S C SAHOO', 'SANJAY KU DASS C VIG']

V'"

\

¥¥s

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK

CRLA No. 101 Of 2012

From the judgment and order dated 10.02.2012 passed by the

Special Judge (Vigilance), Jeypore in G.R.

Case No.20 of

1993(V)/ T.R. No.77 of 2007.

Dr. Balaram Bag

Appel lant

-Versus-

State of Odisha (Vig.)

Respondent

For Appellant:

-

Mr. Hemanta Kumar Mund

For Respondent:

-

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das

Standing Counsel (Vig.)

CRLA No. 125 Of 2017

Gudia Uma Maheswar Rao

.

Appellant

-Versus-

State of Odisha (Vig.)

Respondent

For Appellant:

-

Mr. G.K. Mishra

For Respondent:

-

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das

Standing Counsel (Vig.)

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

Date of Hearing: 28.08.2019

Date of Judgment: 11.09.2019

\

1

\

S. K. SAHOO, J.

The appellants Dr. Balaram Bag (CRLA No. 101 of

2012) and Gudia Uma Maheswar Rao (CRLA No. 125 of 2012)

along with one Bhajaram Swain faced trial in the Court of learned

Special Judge (Vigilance), Jeypore in G.R. Case No.20 of

1993(V)/ T.R. No. 77 of 2007 for offences punishable under

section 13(2) read with section 13(l)(d) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 (hereafter '1988 Act') and section 477-A

read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code on the accusation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top