ORISSA HIGH COURT
PUSTAM SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
Page 1 of 5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 275 OF 2018
Pustam Sahu
Petitioner
Mr. Anurag Pati, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Swayambhu Mishra,
Additional Standing Counsel
(For Opp. Party Nos.1 to 5)
Mr. Ramchandra Rath, Advocate
(For Opp. Party Nos.6 to 10)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
26.04.2022
7.
1.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
The Petitioner in this writ petition seeks to assail the order
dated 22nd November, 2017 (Annexure-5) passed in O.L.R. Revision
Case No.01 of 2016, whereby the Additional District Magistrate,
Bargarh holding that the Revenue Officer is not empowered to pass
order determining the share in the land in question under Section
19(1)(c) of the Odisha Land Reforms Act, 1960 (for short 8the Act9),
allowed the revision filed by Opposite Party Nos.6 to 10.
3.
Short narration of facts necessary for adjudication of the case
is that an application
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.