SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PUSTAM SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S ARJUNA CH BEHERA', '', 'R K DASH', 'S K PARIDA', 'M/S ANURAG PATI', 'T BARIK', 'S HIDAYATULLAH', 'S R OJHA', 'M/S RAMCHANDRA RATH', '', 'S K ACHARYA', 'M K PANDA']

Page 1 of 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 275 OF 2018

Pustam Sahu

Petitioner

Mr. Anurag Pati, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Swayambhu Mishra,

Additional Standing Counsel

(For Opp. Party Nos.1 to 5)

Mr. Ramchandra Rath, Advocate

(For Opp. Party Nos.6 to 10)

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

26.04.2022

7.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The Petitioner in this writ petition seeks to assail the order

dated 22nd November, 2017 (Annexure-5) passed in O.L.R. Revision

Case No.01 of 2016, whereby the Additional District Magistrate,

Bargarh holding that the Revenue Officer is not empowered to pass

order determining the share in the land in question under Section

19(1)(c) of the Odisha Land Reforms Act, 1960 (for short 8the Act9),

allowed the revision filed by Opposite Party Nos.6 to 10.

3.

Short narration of facts necessary for adjudication of the case

is that an application

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top