SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUKRAM LAKRA – Appellant
Versus
STEEL AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S AMIT PR BOSE', '', 'S S ROUTRAY', 'N HOTA', 'D J SAHOO', 'S K DWIBEDI', 'V KAR']

Page 1 of 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

RSA No.376 of 2014

In the matter of an appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil

Procedure assailing the judgment and decree passed by the learned 2nd

Additional District Judge, Rourkela, in R.F.A. No.34/1 of 2011-2013

confirming the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2011 and 15.10.2011

respectively passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division),

Panposh, Rourkela in Civil Suit No.07 of 2009.

----

Sukram Lakra

….

Appellant

-versus-

Steel Authority of India Limited &

Another

….

Respondents

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Appellant

-

M/s.A.P. Bose, N. Hota

S.S. Routray, Mrs.V. Kar

D.J. Sahoo and S.K. Dwibedi

For Respondents -

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE D.DASH

Date of Hearing : 15.02.2022 :

Date of Judgment:21.02.2022

The Defendant No.1 in Civil Suit No.7 of 2009 of the Court of the

learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Panposh, Rourkela is the Appellant

before this Court in the Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the

Code of Civil Procedure (for short, ‘the Code’).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top