SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
TUKU@ABDUL NAIM KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLA 288/2011



Advocates:
['M/S S C SAMANTARAY', '', 'M/S S BEHERA', 'S C CHOUDHRY', 'S P PANDA', 'U K SAHOO', 'J N KAMILA', 'P K MOHANTY']

CRLA Nos.288, 289, 242, 234, 241 and 246 of 2011

Page 1 of 18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLA Nos.288, 289, 242, 234, 241 and 246 of 2011

(From the judgment dated 16th March, 2011 passed by Smt.D.Mohapatra,

Additional Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in Sessions Trial Case No.4/82

of 2007)

CRLA No.288 of 2011

Tuku @ Abdul Naim Khan

……

Appellant

Versus

State of Odisha

…...

Respondent

Advocate(s) appeared in this case :-

For Appellant

:

Mr.J.N.Kamila, Advocate

For Respondent

:

Mr.J.Katikia, AGA

CRLA No.289 of 2011

Sk.Roman

……

Appellant

Versus

State of Odisha

…...

Respondent

Advocate(s) appeared in this case :-

For Appellant

:

Mr.J.N.Kamila, Advocate

For Respondent

:

Mr.J.Katikia, AGA

CRLA Nos.288, 289, 242, 234, 241 and 246 of 2011

Page 2 of 18

CRLA No.242 of 2011

Mir Askar @ Raju

……

Appellant

Versus

State of Odisha

…...

Respondent

Advocate(s) appeared in this case :-

For Appellant

:

Mr.R.Roy, Advocate

For Respondent

:

Mr.J.Katikia, AGA

CRLA No.234 of 2011

Babaji @ Siba Prasad Mohanty

……

Appellant

Versus

State of Odisha

…...

Respondent

Advocate(s) appeared in this case :-

For Appellant

:

Mr.J.N.Kamila, (Amicus Curiae)

For Respondent

:

Mr.J.Katikia, AGA

CRLA No.241 of 2011

Sudam Sundar Satapathy

……

Appellant

Versus

State of Odisha

…...

Respondent

Advocate(s) appeared in this case :-

For Appellant

:

Mr.J.N.Kamila, (Amicus Curiae)

For Respondent

:

Mr.J.Katikia, AGA

CRLA Nos.288, 289, 242, 234, 241 and 246 of 2011

Page 3 of 18

CRLA No.246 of 2011

Bablu @ Nasiruddin Ahmed

……

Appellant

Versus

State of Odisha

…...

Respondent

Advocate(s) appeared in this case :-

For Appellant

:

Mr.R.C.Maharana, Advocate

For Respondent

:

Mr.J.Katikia, AGA

CORAM :

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY

JUDGMENT

04.02.2022

B.P. Routray, J.

1. All the six Appellants in the above appeals have been convicted

under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. in the same trial i.e., S.T.Case

No.4/82 of 2007. Further, the Appellants in CRLA Nos.241, 234, 289

and 288 have been convicted under Section 27 of the Arms Act

additionally. They have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for life for the

offence under Section 302 of the I.P.C. and R.I. for a period of seven

years under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

2.

All the Appellants along with two others were prosecuted in

S.T.Case No.4/82 of 2007 in the court of learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Bhubaneswar.

CRLA Nos.288, 289, 242, 234, 241 and 246 of 2011

Page 4 of 18

3.

Prosecution case is that, the deceased namely Chuna @Mallik

Hanan was killed by Sk Hyder (since dead) and his associates on 31st

May, 2005 between 7.30 to 7.45 P.M. by gunshot firing near Stewart

School, Bhubaneswar due to group rivalry relating to tender fixing. The

Inspector-in-Charge (P.W.47) of Nayapalli Police Station upon receipt

of telephonic information of the incident immediately proceeded to the

spot and found the deceased lying dead in front of the tyre-shop of one

Tahir Alli. P.W.47 drew the plain paper F.I.R., which was registered as

Nayapalli P.S.Case No.157 dated 31st May,2005. He held inquest over

the dead body and seized one motorcycle, one Nokia mobile set, ten

empty cases of cartridges and other articles from the spot. There was

arch enmity between Sk Hyder and the deceased, both gangsters.

Subsequently, Sk.Hyder and others were arrested from Nagpur

(Maharashtra) on 6th June, 2005 and were brought to Bhubaneswar.

P.W. 47 continued with investigation which was later taken over by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top