Page 1 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.1957 of 2018

Sri Amitav Tripathy

….

Petitioner

Mrs. Sujata jena, Advocate

-versus-

Orissa High Court, represented by the

Registrar General

….

Opposite Party

Mr. P. K. Muduli, AGA

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK

Order No.

ORDER

18.05.2022

28.

1. The Law Expert has submitted a detailed report to the Court on

the reevaluation. As far as the answer to Question No.1 in Group-D

is concerned, the result of the reevaluation of the Expert is as under:

“Result of Reevaluation-The candidate has only

written that Section 18 prescribes a bar and has given a

citation which is a wrong one. Hence, for writing that

anticipatory bail provision is not applicable he has to get

0.5 mark and another 0.5 mark for writing Section 18 of

SC ST P.A. Act. Hence, in my opinion he is entitled to 1

mark for his answer to the above question.”

2. As far as Question No.3 in Group-D is concerned, the result of

the reevaluation is as under:

“Result of Reevaluation-The candidate while answering

the above question has only written that the trial of

offen