SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANJAY SAHOO@SANJAY KUMAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SMRUTI RANJAN MOHAPATRA', '', 'B GANTHIA', 'B R MOHANTY', 'S HARICHANDAN', 'M K SWAIN', 'L PATTNAIK']

04.

RKS

20.03.2019

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner being in custody in S.T. Case

No.10 of 2019, arising out of Banki P.S. Case No.207 of

2018, pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge,

Cuttack has filed this petition for his release on bail.

The offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable

under Section 302/34 of I.P.C.

It appears from the materials on record that this

case is based on the circumstancial evidence. The

allegation of the prosecution is that the petitioner

stated to have administer poison to the deceased but,

as it appears from the viscera examination that, no

poisonous substance is found.

No doubt the prosecution has placed reliance on

the statement of the accused persons recorded under

Section 27 of Cr.P.C. but, learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner submits that confession on that part

being distinctly not relating to the fact discovered and

the viscera report, the prosecution has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top