SANJAY SAHOO@SANJAY KUMAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
04.
RKS
20.03.2019
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner being in custody in S.T. Case
No.10 of 2019, arising out of Banki P.S. Case No.207 of
2018, pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge,
Cuttack has filed this petition for his release on bail.
The offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable
under Section 302/34 of I.P.C.
It appears from the materials on record that this
case is based on the circumstancial evidence. The
allegation of the prosecution is that the petitioner
stated to have administer poison to the deceased but,
as it appears from the viscera examination that, no
poisonous substance is found.
No doubt the prosecution has placed reliance on
the statement of the accused persons recorded under
Section 27 of Cr.P.C. but, learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner submits that confession on that part
being distinctly not relating to the fact discovered and
the viscera report, the prosecution has
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.