Advocates:
['M/S SAMIR KU MISHRA', '', 'D K PRADHAN', 'J PRADHAN', 'P P MOHANTY', 'DEEPAK NARENDRA']

Page 1 of 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

C.M.P. No.1700 of 2014

Pramila Dhir Samanta & Ors.

….

Petitioner(s)

Mr. S.K. Mishra,

Advocate

-versus-

Nirakar Dhir

….

Opposite Party(s)

None

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

Order No.

ORDER

30.03.2022

11.

1.

Heard Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for Petitioners. In

spite of appearance of a set of counsel on behalf of the Opposite

Party, nobody appears at the time of call. This matter is, therefore,

decided only hearing the Petitioners.

2.

Dispute involved in this matter relates to rejection of an

application vide Misc. Case No.795 of 1994 by the learned Civil

Judge (Sr. Divn.), BBSR purportedly filed U/s.151 of C.P.C.

requesting the trial court for setting aside the compromise decree

dated 9.02.1982 involving O.S. No.296 of 1981(I).

3.

Short background involved in this case is that the present

Opposite Party instituted O.S. No.296 of 1981(I) praying therein for

a decree of partition of the Scheduled ‘A’ property and

consequential relief therein. It is alleged that in the initial stage the

mot