SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MINAKETAN PARIJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['DEBASNAN DAS', '', 'D BISWAL', 'S S PATTANAYAK', 'A R PATIHARI', 'M/S B N MOHANTY', 'S J BISWAL', 'S ROUT', 'A MOHANTY']

02. 25.02.2020

Shri Arjuna Charan Behera and associate, advocates enter

appearance for the informant by filing power. The same is

kept on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel

for the informant and learned Additional Government

Advocate for the State.

This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant

of bail to the petitioner in connection with G.R. Case No.771 of

2019, arising out of Jatni P.S.Case No.243 of 2019 pending in

the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Jatni for alleged commission of

offences under Sections 409/34 of IPC and Section 27 of the

Arms Act.

Petitioner is inside the custody since 30.08.2019 and in

the

meantime,

investigation

has

been

completed

in

submission of the charge-sheet for the aforesaid offences.

The allegation goes to the extent that this present

petitioner being in-charge of replenishment of money into

different ATMs had misappropriated the amount along with

another co-accused to the tune of Rs.1,72,73,500/- during the

audit period from 01.01.2019 to 14.07.2019.

Having perused the materials as placed by Shri Patnaik,

learned Additional Government Advocate, it appea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top