HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
SHRIKANT MOHTA – Appellant
Versus
REPUBLIC OF INDIA – Respondent
BLAPL 1983/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
BLAPL NO. 1983 Of 2019
An application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
in connection with R.C. Case No. 39(S) of 2014 corresponding to
SPE Case No. 34 of 2014 pending on the file of Special C.J.M.
(C.B.I.), Bhubaneswar.
----------------------------
Shrikant Mohta
&..&
Petitioner
-Versus-
Republic of India
&&.
Opp. Party
For Petitioner: - Mr. Suresh Tripathy
For Opp. party:
-
Mr. Anup Kumar Bose
(Asst. Solicitor General)
Mr. Kali Charan Mishra
Special P.P., C.B.I.
---------------------------------
P R E S E N T:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Order: 13.05.2019
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S. K. SAHOO, J.
The petitioner Shrikant Mohta who is an accused in R.C.
Case No. 39(S) of 2014 corresponding to SPE Case No. 34 of 2014
pending on the file of Special C.J.M. (C.B.I.), Bhubaneswar for
offences punishable under sections 420, 408, 409, 120-B/34 of the
Indian Penal Code read with sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize Chits
and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 (hereafter
2
81978 Act9), has filed this application under section 439 of Code of
Criminal Procedure seeking for bail as his bail application has been
rejected by the learned Sessions Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar in
Bail Application No.200 of 2019 vide order dated 14.02.2019.
2.
The present case was instituted by clubbing three First
Information Reports of three different cases i.e. Buguda P.S. Case
No.75 of 2013, Jeypore Town P.S. Case No.71 of 2013 and Nuapada
P.S. Case No.82 of 2013 in pursuance of the order dated 09.05.2014
of the Hon9ble Supreme Court of India passed in W.P. (Civil) No.401
of 2013 filed by Shri Subrata Chattoraj and W.P. (Civil) No.413 of
2013 filed by Shri Alok Jena.
According to the prosecution case, Rose Valley Group of
Companies (hereafter for short 8Rose Valley9) collected huge amount
of money from public enticing them with false promise of paying
higher rates of interest although Rose Valley was not having any
authorization from the Reserve Bank of India (hereafter for short
8RBI9) or the Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereafter for
short 8SEBI9) for carrying out such activities and therefore, the
company cheated the public.
Investigation revealed that 8Rose Valley Resorts and
Plantations Limited, Kolkata9 was founded in the year 1997 and in
the year 2002, SEBI imposed ban on the teak based investment
schemes which the company was carrying out, for which the
3
schemes floated were stopped. The company was renamed as 8Rose
Valley Hotel and Entertainment Limited9 in the year 1999. Two more
companies in the name of 8Rose Valley Real Estates Constructions
Limited9 and 8Real Estate and Landbank India Ltd.9 were founded
subsequently in the year 1999 and 2001 which were registered with
the Registrar of Companies (hereafter for short 8ROC9). Rose Valley
started expanding its spheres and a lot of new companies were
formed in between 1997 to 2012. The accused persons, namely
Goutam Kundu, Chairman of Rose Valley, Shibamoy Dutta, Managing
Director, Ashok Kumar Saha and Ram Lal Goswami, Directors of
Rose Valley in furtherance of criminal conspiracy by establishing
branches of the companies in different parts of India, collected
money from the public through multi-level agent network system.
They cheated the investors/depositors by way of camouflaged
schemes and false assurance about legal sanctity and false promise
of higher rates of interest. The accused persons also cheated the
depositors as well as the agents b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.