ORISSA HIGH COURT
RAGHUNATHA PALEI – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL SECY. GOVT.OF ODISHA – Respondent
Page 1 of 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 6585 of 2021
(Through Hybrid Mode)
Raghunatha Palei
…..
Petitioner
Mr. C.R. Pattnaik, Advocate
Vs.
Principal Secy. Govt. of
Odisha & Ors.
…..
Opposite Parties
Mr. A.K.Sharma, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
09.11.2021
Order No.
03.
1.
Mr. Pattnaik, learned advocate appears on behalf of
petitioner and submits, his client is handicapped person, who
seeks compensation in terms of serial no. 43 in annexure 1 in
schedule of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995. Mr. Sharma, learned
advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, by memo
dated 29th January, 2021, Collector, Keonjhar rejected the
claim mainly on ground that petitioner does not belong to
Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes category. He is of
general category.
2.
Mr. Patnaik, learned advocate appears on behalf of
petitioner submits further that Protection of Civil Rights Act,
1955 came before Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
// 2 //
Page 2 of 3
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Act of 1955 was
with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.