ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUBASH CHANDRA PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
14. 18.03.2021
1. Heard Mr. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioners;
Mr. S. Palit, learned Additional Government Advocate for the
State-Opposite Party Nos.1 to 7, and Mr. V. Narasingh,
learned counsel for Opposite Party No.8.
2. The present petition has been filed as a purported public
interest litigation by five persons claiming to be the residents
of village Muninda in district Puri aggrieved by the
construction of a Kalyan Mandap, which according to them is
taking place on a Gochar land. The second ground on which
they have raised objection is that the Kalyan Mandap is going
to be constructed near a riverbank well as the school situated
near the riverbank.
3. As far as first objection is concerned, in a counter filed to
the rejoinder, the Opposite Parties have enclosed a copy of the
order dated 22nd June 2019, passed by the Collector, Puri de-
reserving the land in question over which the Kalyan Mandap
is being constructed. In other words, the land in question is no
longer a Gochar land and therefore, there can be no objection
to the construction of a Kalyan Mandap thereon. If the
Petitioners are aggrieved by the de-reservation order, it will be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.