SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SATISH AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
SUDHA AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S SAMIR KU MISHRA', '', 'S ROUT', 'S K BISWAL', 'A K DASH', 'J PRADHAN', 'MISS P S MOHANTY', 'M/S SUPRIYA PATRA', 'D K PATRA']

Page 1 of 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

RPFAM No. 91 of 2018

Satish Agrawal

..&

Petitioner

Mr. Samir Kumar Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

Sudha Agarwal and another

&.

Opp. Parties

Mrs. Supriya Patra, Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

07.03.2022

12.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

The Petitioner in this RPFAM seeks to assail the order

dated 28th July, 2017 (Annexure-6) passed by learned Judge,

Family Court, Sambalpur in CMC No.54 of 2014, whereby a

petition filed by the Petitioner under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. for

setting aside the ex parte order dated 23rd July, 2014

(Annexure-3) passed in CMC No.473 of 2012, was dismissed.

3.

It is submitted by Mr. Mishra, learned counsel that the

Petitioner is the husband of Opposite Party No.1 and Opposite

Party No.2 has been born out of their wedlock. As dissensions

arose between the parties they started living separately.

Subsequently, the Opposite Party No.1 filed CMC No.473 of

2012 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Although the Petitioner wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top