HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
B. P. ROUTRAY, J
CHANDAN MALIK@ CHANDAN MALLIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
BLAPL/1973/2022
Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.1973 of 2022
Chandan Malik@Chandan Mallik
….
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Dwibedi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and another
…. Opposite Parties
Ms. S. Mishra, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
12.05.2022
Order No.
02.
1. This is an application under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for bail and the
offences alleged are under Secs.363/365/366/376(3)/376(2)(n),
I.P.C. and Sec.6 of the POCSO Act and Section 9 of the
Prevention of Child Marriage Act, 2009.
2. Heard Mr. S.K. Dwibedi, learned counsel for the Petitioner as
well as Ms. S. Mishra, learned A.S.C. for the State-Opposite
Party.
3. It is submitted that the Petitioner is inside custody since
13.12.2020 and during his release on interim bail, the victim
again came to his house and stayed there, for which another case
in Itamati P.S. Case No.180/2021 is registered. It is further
submitted that as per the statement of the victim recorded under
Sec.164, Cr.P.C. in both the cases, the victim has stated her love
relationship with the Petitioner and wanted to stay in the house of
the Petitioner. The Petitioner is a boy aged about 21 years only.
Page 2 of 2
4. Miss S. Mishra, learned A.S.C. for the State-Opposite Party
on the other hand submits that the victim being a girl below the
age of 15 years, her statement with regard to willingness to stay
with the Petitioner is not acceptable.
5. Upon hearing both parties and considering the statement of
the victim recorded under Sec.164, Cr.P.C. and the surrounding
circumstances of the case, it is directed to release the Petitioner
on bail in connection with Itamati P.S. Case No.145/2020
corresponding to T.R. Case No.24/2021 on such terms and
conditions to be fixed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-
cum-Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Nayagarh as he deems
just and proper including the condition that the Petitioner shall
not dissuade any witness directly or indirectly by way of
inducement, threat or promise acquainted with the facts of the
case from disclosing such facts before the court or tamper with
the evidence.
6. The BLAPL is disposed of.
7. An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper
application.
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
B.K. Barik