SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
B. P. ROUTRAY, J
CHANDAN MALIK@ CHANDAN MALLIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Page 1 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.1973 of 2022

Chandan Malik@Chandan Mallik

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Dwibedi, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa and another

…. Opposite Parties

Ms. S. Mishra, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

12.05.2022

Order No.

02.

1. This is an application under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for bail and the

offences alleged are under Secs.363/365/366/376(3)/376(2)(n),

I.P.C. and Sec.6 of the POCSO Act and Section 9 of the

Prevention of Child Marriage Act, 2009.

2. Heard Mr. S.K. Dwibedi, learned counsel for the Petitioner as

well as Ms. S. Mishra, learned A.S.C. for the State-Opposite

Party.

3. It is submitted that the Petitioner is inside custody since

13.12.2020 and during his release on interim bail, the victim

again came to his house and stayed there, for which another case

in Itamati P.S. Case No.180/2021 is registered. It is further

submitted that as per the statement of the victim recorded under

Sec.164, Cr.P.C. in both the cases, the victim has stated her love

relationship with the Petitioner a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top