Advocates:
['M/S S K SAMANTARAY', '', 'B SAHOO', 'M/S BISHNU PRASAD PRADHAN', 'B NAYAK', 'B R SAHU', 'M/S BISWAJIT MOHAPATRA', 'M/S SANGRAM KESHARI SAHU', '', 'M/S DAYANAND MOHAPATRA', 'MANAS R PRADHAN', 'J BARIK', 'P K SINGHDEO']

Page 1 of 4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP NO.258 OF 2019

Sudhamayee Pattnaik & ors.

….

Petitioners

Mr.S.K.Samantaray, Adv.

-versus-

Bibhu Prasad Sahoo & ors.

….

Opposite Party(s)

Mr.D.Mohapatra, Adv. for O.Ps.1 & 2

Mr.B.P.Pradhan, Adv. for O.Ps.3 to 6

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

Order

No.

ORDER

28.3.2022

7.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

2.

The CMP involves allowing an Application under Order 1

Rule 10 of C.P.C. undisputedly at the instance of Defendant Nos.1 to

3. For the facts disclosure in the suit involving declaration,

permanent injunction and recovery of possession, in filing the

Application under Order 1 Rule 10 of C.P.C., Defendant Nos.1 to 4

attempted to bring third party interest claiming to have been taken

place involving the disputed property. Considering the rival

contentions of the Parties, the trial court allowed the Application by

the impugned order.

3.

Mr.Samantaray, learned counsel for the Petitioners however

referring to the objection to such Application by the Plaintiffs

// 2 //

Page 2 of 4

submitted