RABINDRA PRASAD PATTNAIK – Appellant
Versus
THE DM-CUM-COLLECTOR – Respondent
Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.6374 of 2022
Rabindra Prasad Pattnaik & Ors.
&.
Petitioner(s)
Mr. P.K. Mohapatra,
Advocate
-versus-
The D.M.-cum-Collector & Anr.
&.
Opposite Parties
Mr. S. Ghose,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
Order No.
ORDER
14.03.2022
01.
1.
Learned counsel for Petitioners alleges that in the first round
of litigation basing on the submission of the competent authority that
there is abandonment of the scheme for which the Petitioners had
pending application, the Court after recording the statement of the
public authority permitted the Petitioners to file application for
refund of money and in such event there was also direction to
consider such request of the Petitioners. It is stated through the
records more particularly at Annexures-1 & 2 that the Petitioners
applying the provisions under the R.T.I. Act, 2005 have been
intimated that neither there is any action in abandonment of the
proposal nor there is any agenda till date of supply of the
information on 22.01.2022. This Court here
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.