SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
RAMAKANTA DAS – Appellant
Versus
NARAHARI MALLIK – Respondent


W.P.(C) No.408 of 2007

22.01.2016

Assailing the order dated 04.01.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Di

vn.), Balasore in T.S. No.58 of 2002-I, the present petition has been filed under Article 227

of the Constitution of India. By the said order, learned trial court rejected the application

of the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. for being impleaded as parties to the suit.

Opposite party nos.1 to 6 as plaintiffs instituted C.S. No.58 of 2002-I in the

court of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Balasore for partition of the suit schedule pro

perty and permanent injunction impleading the opposite party no.7 as defendant. During pendenc

y of the suit, the petitioners filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. for being imp

leaded as parties to the suit. It is stated that there was an earlier partition on 19.11.1953

and a part of the same fell to their share. Thus, they are the necessary parties to the suit.

The same was opposed by the contesting defendant. By order dated 4.1.2007, learned trial court

rejected the said application.

Heard Mr. Kar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Swain, learned c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top