SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJ SENAPATI – Appellant
Versus
SWATI PATRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['A PATTANAIK', '', 'J BEHERA', 'M/S A P BOSE', 'V KAR', 'D J SAHOO', 'S NAYAK', 'A PATTANAIK']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MATA No.38 of 2020

MATA No.38 of 2020 & 104 of 2020

Manoj Senapati

(in MATA No.38 of 2020)

Swati Patra

(in MATA No.104 of 2020)

&.

Appellants

Mr. A. Pattnaik, Advocate in MATA No.38 of 2020

Mr. Amit Prasad Bose, Advocate in MATA No.104 of 2020

-versus-

Swati Patra

(in MATA No.38 of 2020)

Manoj Senapati

(in MATA No.104 of 2020)

&.

Respondents

Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate in MATA No.38 of 2020

Mr. A. Pattnaik, Advocate in MATA No.104 of 2020

CORAM:

SHRI JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA

SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

7.7.2022

Order No.

10.

1. The matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. Heard Mr. A. Pattanaik, learned counsel appearing for the

Appellant in MATA No.38 of 2020 and the Respondent in MATA

No.104 of 2020 as well as Mr. A.P. Bose, learned counsel

appearing for the Respondent in MATA No.38 of 2020 and the

Appellant in MATA No.104 of 2020.

3. So far the appeal being MATA No.38 of 2020 is concerned, this

appeal has been heard with appeal being MATA No.104 of 2020

filed by the Respondent of MATA No.38 of 2020. In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top