SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
ARUN KUMAR PANDA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA,NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S A TRIPATHY', '', 'B MOHANTY', 'M/S SRINIVAS PATNAIK', 'N C ROUT', 'T P PAUL', '', 'DEBABRATA RATH', 'CGC']

Page 1 of 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.20056 of 2016

(Through hybrid mode)

Arun Kumar Panda and another

….

Petitioners

Mr. A.Tripathy, Advocate

-versus-

Union of India, New Delhi and

others

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. P.K.Parhi, Advocate (ASG) (for O.P.no.1)

Mr. Srinivas Patnaik, Advocate (for O.P. no.2)

CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA

Order No.

ORDER

22.02.2022

05.

1.

The writ petition was moved before this Bench on 4th

January, 2022.

2.

Mr. Tripathy, learned advocate appeared on behalf of

petitioners and submitted, his clients are owner of the land.

Lease of the land was given to one Gollak Behera for operating

retail outlet (RO) and said person obtained licence from Bharat

Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL). The oil company

terminated the licence by letter dated 14th June, 2007.

Subsequent thereto, the oil company appointed M/s. D.R. Patra

and Sons to operate the RO. His clients in tandem also granted

lease to M/s. D.R. Patra and Sons. However, M/s. D.R. Patra

and Sons abandoned the site. His clients did not get usufructs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top