SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
HRUDANANDA MAHANTA@CHITRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S ARIJEET MISHRA', '', 'R MOHANTA', 'S BISWAL', 'S K JENA', 'M/S SUNIL KU PANDA', '', 'A K JENA', 'S DAS', 'K PANDA']

BLAPL No.3114 of 2016

05. 19.10.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learn

ed State Counsel on the application under section 439 Cr.P.C. for release of the petitioner on

bail who allegedly involved with the offence under Sections 363/36/376/506 of the Indian Pena

l Code read with Section 6 of POCSO Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no direct mat

erial against the petitioner. There was love affair between the petitioner and the victim and

there is no bodily injury on the person of the victim. He further submits that in the meantime

charge sheet has been submitted for which lenient view may be taken to release the petitione

rs on bail on any condition as deemed just and proper. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel opposes

the prayer for bail.

3. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parti

es, regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that there

is no direct material against the petitioner, fact that there was love affair between the peti

tioner and the victim, fact that he medical report is silent about an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top