SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
ANIL KU.RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE and ORS – Respondent


Page 1 of 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.7363 of 2013

Anil Kumar Rana and others

…. Petitioners

Mr. K. Rath, Advocate

-Versus-

State of Orissa and others

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, ASC

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Order No.

ORDER

21.06.2022

R.K.Pattanaik, J

04.

1. Instant writ petition under Article(s) 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 is at the behest of the Petitioners

questioning the legality and judicial propriety of the impugned

decision and consequential action of the Principal, ITI,

Balasore (O.P.No.4) vide Annexure-5 and for having changed

the nomenclature of the post held by them as Assistant

Training Officers (ATOs) to Part Time Guest Instructors

(PTGIs) and further instructing to release their remuneration

on hourly basis as unilateral, arbitrary and malafide and

therefore, to quash it and also to direct the Opposite Parties to

grant salary @ Rs.9,300/- per month as per the ORSP Rules,

2008 with consequential benefits.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top