SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL), ORISSA HIGH COURT – Appellant
Versus
KRUSHNA CHANDRA DASH – Respondent


Advocates:
['ADV', 'M/S DURGA PRASANA DAS', 'P K PTTANAIK', 'S P DAS', 'S DAS']

Page 1 of 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

SUO MOTU CONTC No.1863 of 2021

Registrar (Judicial) Orissa High

Court

&.

Petitioner

Advocate

-versus-

Krushna Chandra Das & Anr.

&.

Opp. Party/

Contemnors

Mr.A.K.Mishra,

Advocate for OP.1

Mr.D.P. Das,

Advocate for OP.2

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

Order No.

ORDER

27.09.2021

08.

1.

This is a contempt imitated suo-motu. Mr.Nagendra Kumar

Sethi, Contemnor No.2 is present in Court. After providing

opportunity to file response entering into argument by order dated

31.8.2021, in rejection of the plea of both Contemnors on the

premises of benefit involved being decided through the Division

Bench of this Court in Appeal, this Court directed for personal

appearance of both Contemnors on the date fixed. Undertaking the

exercise on 13.09.2021, this Court recording the exercise at the

instance of Contemnor No.1 completed in the meantime postponed

the matter to 14.09.2021 to hear the Contemnor No.2 as he was

absent on 13.09.2021. In the proceeding on 14.09.2021, it could be

// 2 //

Page 2 of 7

noticed that the petitioner though entitled to 9% interest o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top