HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
RAMESH CHANDRA GIRI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BBSR-CUTTACK – Respondent
WP(C) 19171/2017
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK.
W.P.(C) Nos.19171 and 16414 of 2017
In the matters of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India.
---------
(in W.P.(C) No.19171 of 2017)
Ramesh Chandra Giri & others
……
Petitioners
-Versus-
Commissioner of Police,
Bhubaneswar-Cuttack Police Commissionerate,
Bhubaneswar & others
……
Opp. Parties
For Petitioners
:
M/s K.B. Panda & S. Mishra
For Opp. Parties :
Mr. D.K. Mishra, A.G.A.
(for O.Ps. 1, 2, 4 to 6)
Mr. D. Panda (for O.P.-4)
(in W.P.(C) No.16414 of 2017)
Saniya Akhtar
……
Petitioner
-Versus-
Sub-Registrar,
Balianta, Bhubaneswar & others
……
Opp. Parties
For Petitioner
:
M/s B. K. Mahapatra
For Opp. Parties :
Mr. D.K. Mishra, A.G.A.
(for O.Ps. 1 to 3)
Mr.
D.
Panda,
A.
K.
Parida,
S. Panda & G. Mohanty
(for O.P.-4)
2
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA
Date of Judgment – 08.03.2019
S.K. MISHRA, J.
In both these writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for writ
of mandamus directing the opposite party nos.1 and 2 especially the
opposite party no.2- Inspector-In-Charge, Saheed Nagar Police Station,
Bhubaneswar in W.P.(C) No.19171 of 2017 and the opposite party no.3 in
W.P.(C) No.16414 of 2017 (hereinafter referred to as <the Inspector-In-
Charge= for brevity) to modify the order dated 12.01.2017 in a project
specific manner pertaining to Sai Enclave Project so as to enable them to
register their dwelling units booked by them in their names individually.
The petitioners have also prayed for a direction to the opposite party no.3-
Maa Tarini Estcon (P) Ltd., represented through its Managing Director,
Niranjan Rana in W.P.(C) No.19171 of 2017 and the opposite party no.4 in
W.P.(C) No.16414 of 2017 (hereinafter referred to as <the Company= for
brevity) to register the dwelling units booked by them individually in their
names and hand over physical possession of the same within a specific
period and direct the opposite party nos.4 and 5 in W.P.(C) No.19171 of
2017 and the opposite party nos.1 and 2 in W.P.(C) no.16414 of 2017
(hereinafter referred to as <the statutory authorities= for brevity) to allow
and accept the sale deeds for registration of plots/ houses in the Project of
the Company in the name and style of <Sai Enclave, Balianta= so as to
3
enable them to register the sale deeds of their dwelling units as purchased
by them from the Company.
02.
It was apparent from the records that the Company floated
e-advertisement in local Daily Newspaper for construction and sale of
Simplex, Duplex and Apartments/ Flats and one of them is in the name
and style of <Sai Enclave= Housing Complex at Tiranpada, Balianta,
Bhubaneswar-752101. Pursuant to the same, the petitioners submitted
applications and made deposits for booking of flats at <Sai Enclave= and all
of them had booked residential accommodations with the Company at the
site mentioned above. This development took place in between 2009-2011.
On 15.05.2010, the Company entered into agreements with the petitioners
individually
on
separate
dates
for
sale
of
accommodations.
The
accommodations booked by the petitioners were to be delivered within
twenty-four months from the date of booking. By the end of June, 2014,
the Company should have delivered physical possession of the residential
units to the petitioners, but the Company did not do so. On 26.09.2015,
the Company gave an undertaking to the petitioners to com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.