ORISSA HIGH COURT
DEEPAK AGRAWAL @ DEEPU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
BLAPL 2508/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 2508 Of 2021
An application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure in connection with Markatnagar P.S. Case No.20 of
2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.122 of 2021 pending on the
file of S.D.J.M. (Sadar), Cuttack.
----------------------------
Deepak Agrawal @ Deepu …... Petitioner
-Versus-
State of Odisha
…... Opp. Party
For Petitioner: - M/s. Yasobanta Das
(Senior Advocate)
Devashis Panda
Sudipto Panda
D.K. Mohapatra
B. Jena
For Opp. party:
-
Mr. Jyoti Prakash Patra
Addl. Standing Counsel
-----------------------------
P R E S E N T:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Order: 04.10.2021
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.K. SAHOO, J.
The petitioner Deepak Agrawal @ Deepu has
knocked at the portals of this Court by filing this application
under section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking for bail
in connection with Markatnagar P.S. Case No.20 of 2021
// 2 //
Page 2 of 22
corresponding to G.R. Case No.122 of 2021 pending on the file of
learned S.D.J.M. (Sadar), Cuttack in which charge sheet has
been submitted for the offences punishable under sections 417,
420, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code, sections 51, 52, 53, 59
of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 (hereafter referred to
as ‘2006 Act’), sections 33 and 36 of the Legal Metrology Act,
2009 (hereafter referred to as ‘2009 Act’) and Rule 32 of the
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 (hereafter
referred to as ‘2011 Rules).
The petitioner moved an application for bail in the
Court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack, which
was rejected vide order dated 23.03.2021 mainly on the ground
that the investigation of the case was under progress and the
complete chain of adulteration was to be unearthed and there
was every chance of tampering with the evidence.
2.
The factual matrix of the case on hand is that,
Pradipta Kishore Naik, Inspector in-charge of Markatnagar police
station, Cuttack UPD drew up a plain paper F.I.R. to the effect
that on 30.01.2021 while he was in the police station, he got
credible information regarding storage of huge quantity of
adulterated and duplicate ghee at Plot No.7D/1275, Sector-9,
C.D.A., Cuttack by the petitioner. He conducted confidential
enquiry and during enquiry, he ascertained that the information
// 3 //
Page 3 of 22
received was correct. He intimated the fact to his superiors and
also gave requisition to the Food Safety Officer, C.M.C., Cuttack
and Senior Inspector, Legal Metrology, Cuttack-II to accompany
with him during the search. He along with his staff proceeded to
the spot for conducting search in the house of the petitioner to
verify the authenticity of the information and he procured two
independent witnesses, namely, Bikash Bhanja and Satyananda
Das on the way. At about 12.20 p.m., they reached in the house
of the petitioner and noticed that the petitioner was present in
his house. On being asked, the petitioner disclosed that he was
selling different brands of ghee and other burning oils in his
house to different small shops at Cuttack and Angul. On
verification of his house, it was noticed that there was storage
huge quantities of ghee of different brands. There was storage of
Balaji Puja Vanaspati Binayak ghee in plastic jars of different
quantities, tin jars of R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.