SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAY SAGAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUNIL KUMAR PANDA', '', 'K PANDA', 'A K JENA', 'S ROUT', 'B SINGH']

Jay Sagar

Petitioner

-VERSUS-

State of Odisha

...

Opp.Party

06.

11.01.2021

The

matter

is

taken

up

through

Video

Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned counsel for the State.

This is an application for bail under section 439

of Cr.P.C. in connection with Sambalpur Town P.S. Case

No.18 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 140 of

2020 pending in the file of learned S.D.J.M., Sambalpur

for alleged commission of offences under sections 419

and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 66C and

66D of the Information Technology Act.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected

by the learned Sessions Judge, Sambalpur vide order

dated 17.03.2020.

Considering

the

submissions made

by

the

learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in

judicial custody since 05.02.2020, charge sheet has

already been submitted under sections 419 and 420 of

the Indian Penal Code and sections 66C and 66D of the

Information Technology Act and on hearing the learned

counsel for the State, who submitted that the petitioner

is a man of Jharkhand and he has got two criminal

antec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top