SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MAITREE SANSAD – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF SECY – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S S K DAS', '', 'A MOHANTY', 'M K DAS']

27. 05.08.2019

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Admittedly a Committee has been set up

pursuant to the direction of the Hon9ble Supreme

Court vide order dated 25.09.2018 passed in Writ

Petition (Civil) No.406 of 2013 which reads as

under :

REPORTABLE

<IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 406 OF 2013

RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS

O R D E R

Madan B. Lokur, J.

1. Over the years, public interest litigation has

brought

immense

social

change

through

interventions made and directions issued by this

Court. Public interest litigation has been initiated,

very rarely, by suo motu exercise of jurisdiction by

this Court. On most occasions, it has been initiated

through a writ petition filed by activist individuals

or organisations. Again, quite infrequently, it has

been initiated on the basis of a communication

received by this Court.

2. During the last several decades, public interest

litigation has compelled this Court to consider

issues relating to the environment, social justice,

violation of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top