SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANASH KUMAR PATTANAIK – Appellant
Versus
SRIKANTA PATTANAIK – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S ANTARYAMI SWAIN', '', 'A N SWAIN', 'M/S N P PARIJA', 'A K MOHANTY', 'S K ROUT', 'S PARIJA']

Page 1 of 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP NO. 776 OF 2018

Manash Kumar Pattanaik and others

&.

Petitioners

Mr.Antaryami Swain, Advocate

-versus-

Srikanta Pattanaik and others

&.

Opp. Parties

Mr. N.P. Parija, Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

16.12.2021

14.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The Petitioners in this CMP seek to assail the order

dated 12th April, 2018 passed by learned District Judge,

Jagatsinghpur in FAO No. 80 of 2017 confirming the order

dated 2nd May, 2016 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior

Division), Jagatsinghpur in I.A. No. 241 of 2017 (arising out of

C.S. No.299 of 2017).

3.

It is submitted by Mr. Swain, learned counsel that the

Petitioners are rightful purchaser of the land from the recorded

tenant, namely, Bhikari Nayak, who is none other than their

father, for consideration. After purchase, they got the land

mutated in their name. The father had so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top