SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DARPANARAYAN GOPE – Appellant
Versus
GRID CO – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S SOMANATH MISHRA', '', 'G TRIPATHY', 'M/S B K PATNAIK', 'P SINHA', 'P SAHOO', 'R NAYAK', 'A PANIGRAHI', '', 'S C DASH']

OJC No. 10779 of 2000

25.11.2016

Ms. S. Pattnaik on behalf of Mr. B.K. Pattnaik, learned counsel for the opposite party

nos. 2 and 3 states that though initially they have appeared on behalf of the said opposite p

arties, the file has been transferred from their office and, therefore, they have no instructi

on in the matter. Thereby, their names may be deleted from the cause list.

The names of B.K. Pattnaik, learned counsel and associates be deleted from the cause l

ist.

As it appears from the records, Mr. S.C. Dash, learned counsel has already entered app

earance on behalf of opposite party no.3 and also filed counter affidavit.

Heard Mr. Somanath Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.C. Dash, learn

ed counsel for the opposite party no.3.

The petitioner claims for compassionate appointment under the Rehabilitation Assistanc

e Scheme of the Orissa State Electricity Board (Rehabilitation Assistance) Regulation, 1992 du

e to the premature death of his father, who was working as a Lineman-B under the opposite part

ies.

Mr. Somanath Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners fa

ther, who was wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top