DARPANARAYAN GOPE – Appellant
Versus
GRID CO – Respondent
OJC No. 10779 of 2000
25.11.2016
Ms. S. Pattnaik on behalf of Mr. B.K. Pattnaik, learned counsel for the opposite party
nos. 2 and 3 states that though initially they have appeared on behalf of the said opposite p
arties, the file has been transferred from their office and, therefore, they have no instructi
on in the matter. Thereby, their names may be deleted from the cause list.
The names of B.K. Pattnaik, learned counsel and associates be deleted from the cause l
ist.
As it appears from the records, Mr. S.C. Dash, learned counsel has already entered app
earance on behalf of opposite party no.3 and also filed counter affidavit.
Heard Mr. Somanath Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.C. Dash, learn
ed counsel for the opposite party no.3.
The petitioner claims for compassionate appointment under the Rehabilitation Assistanc
e Scheme of the Orissa State Electricity Board (Rehabilitation Assistance) Regulation, 1992 du
e to the premature death of his father, who was working as a Lineman-B under the opposite part
ies.
Mr. Somanath Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners fa
ther, who was wo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.