SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRAHALAD CHANDRA SAMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 4919 of 2021

Prahalad Chandra Samal and

another

&.

Petitioners

Mr. Parsuram Panda, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

&.

Opposite Party

Mr. M. K. Mohanty, Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. K. PANIGRAHI

Order No.

ORDER

22.04.2021

02.

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

counsel for the State.

3. Petitioners apprehending their arrest in Ambadola PS

UD Case No. 2 of 2021 for the alleged commission of

offence punishable under Section 506/34 of the IPC,

have filed this petition for their release on anticipatory

bail.

4. Perused the allegation made in the FIR.

5. The brief fact of the case in nutshell is that the

present petitioners are the husband and the wife. They

are adopted parents of one Jyoti Prakash Samal. On

09.04.2021 at about 2:30 PM, petitioners9 adopted minor

kid defecated on the floor. Petitioner No. 1, his father

took his minor kid to the bathroom for cleaning,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top