SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DR. NANDINI MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['KALI PRASANNA MISHRA', '', 'S RATH', 'L P DWIVEDY', 'A MISHRA']

W.P.(C) No. 14057 of 2021

And

I.A. No. 6192 of 2021

03.

29.04.2021

The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

Heard Mr. K.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to

submit application for her participation in the selection process

pursuant to Advertisement at Annexure-5 as she is eligible to make

application.

It is contended that earlier the petitioner has approached this

Court by filing W.P.(C) No. 6132 of 2016 seeking regularization of

service and the matter is subjudice. Since her application for fresh

appointment pursuant to advertisement in Annexure-5 has not be

entertained, she has approached this Court by filing the instant writ

petition with a prayer to participate in the selection process without

prejudice her claim in W.P.(C) No. 6132 of 2016.

Issue notice to opposite parties.

One extra copy of the writ petition be served on learned Addl.

Government, who appears for opposite party no.1, within three days,

enabling him to obtain instruction or file counter affidavit.

Steps to serve notice on opposite parties no. 2 and 3 be taken

within three days by registered

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top