SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SULOCHANA MODI – Appellant
Versus
PAWAN KU.MODI – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S GOUTAM KU ACHARYA', '', 'A K BUDHIA', 'S K BEHERA', 'A PANDA', 'D P MISHRA', 'D K NAIK', 'M/S ASOK KUMAR PANIGRAHI', '', 'B S DAS']

Page 1 of 24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ARBA NO.15 OF 2017

Smt. Sulochana Modi

….

Appellant

Mr. Goutam Acharya, Senior Advocate

M/s Arun Kumar Budhia, S. K. Behera,

D. K. Naik, D. P. Mishra & Mrs. A. Panda

-versus-

Sri Pawan Kumar Modi

….

Respondent

M/s. Ashok Kumar Panigrahi

and Bhabani Sankar Das

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

Order No.

JUDGMENT

30.06.2021

02.

1.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the Arbitration Act’) has

been filed assailing the judgment and order dated 25.09.2017

passed by learned District Judge, Cuttack in ARBP No.43 of

2015 filed by the Appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration

Act, whereby dismissing the Arbitration Petition, learned

District Judge confirmed the award dated 14.12.2015 passed by

the Arbitration Tribunal, Cuttack in Arbitration Case No.3 of

2013.

2.1

Short

narration

of

facts

necessary

for

proper

adjudication of this appeal are that a deed of Partnership at Will

was execu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top