RUPARANI BANGARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
03. 15.10.2020
I. A. No.975 of 2020
Mr. B. Baug,
: For the Appellants
Advocate
Mr. M. S. Sahoo,
: For Respondent Nos.1 to 6
Addl. Govt. Advocate
(State of Odisha)
ORDER
The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.
This application has been filed by the respondents-State
for correction of typographical error in the order dated
29.06.2020.
It is averred in the above Interlocutory Application that
in the last line of paragraph-4 of the order dated 29.06.2020,
the words “for grant of temporary injuction” have been
mentioned instead of “alleging disobedience or breach of
injunction”. Similarly, in the 1st line of paragraph-6 of the said
order, the words “application for temporary injunction” have
been reflected instead of “application alleging disobedience or
breach of injuction.” Accordingly, a prayer has been made to
correct the same.
Keeping in view the averments stated in the application,
the same is allowed.
W.A No.374
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.