SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BAIDHAR ROUT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S SURESH KU JENA', '', 'A MISHRA', 'S BISWAL', 'R MAHATO']

CRLMC NO. 3252 of 2015

06.08.2015

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate

.

Petitioner has filed this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging th

e order dated 30.11.2012 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Jajpur in I.C.C. No. 370 of 2012. The

court below taken cognizance of offence under Sections 341,323,294,506 of the I.P.C. read wit

h Section 3 S.C./ST (PA) Act against the petitioner and issued summon to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the complainant has

filed I.C.C. No. 261 of 2008 and the same was sent to Police for investigation under Section

156(3) of the Cr.P.C. After investigation the case was registered as G.R. Case No. 596 of 2008

. The police has already filed final form on completion of investigation. Thereafter the compl

ainant has filed a protest petition registered as ICC Case No. 370 of 2012, the court below on

perusal of record passed the impugned order.

Considering the above facts and circumstances as the court has taken cognizanc

e and issued summon to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to interfer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top