SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BATAKRUSHNA NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S PRAFULLA KU RATH', '', 'A K ROUT', 'A BEHERA', 'A K BEHERA', 'B K DASH', 'R N PARIJA', 'S K BEHERA', 'P K SAHOO']

W.P.(c) No.19406 of 2017

12.09.2017

Heard Mr. P.K. Rath, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Central Go

vernment Counsel Mr. Aurovinda Mohanty, who has filed memo of appearance in the Court today an

d learned Addl. Government Advocate Mr. K.K. Mishra.

The petitioners, being the resident of Sherpur Grama Panchayat, have filed thi

s writ application seeking for quashing of Annexure 5 and 6. Annexure-5 and 6 are revised list

of beneficiaries for allotment of house under the schemes like Pradhan Mantry Awas Yojana, Bi

ju Pucca Ghar Yojana etc. The grievance of the petitioners is that, as per the guidelines issu

ed by the Union of India in Annexure-1, which is also adopted and re-issued by the State Gover

nment in Annexure-2 and as per the scheme, the name of the persons, who have already given hom

estead, should be deleted from the auto generated list. Though that is being done, the grievan

ce of the petitioners is that instead of serially taking the rest of the applicants, the discr

imination is meted to the persons, who are in the top of the list, after deletion of the name

by benefited persons, their names are appearing at the bottom of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top