SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUBASH DIGAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['MIHIR KANTA RATH', '', 'C PADHI', 'R N TRIPATHY']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No. 4516 of 2021

Subash Digal

….

Petitioner

Mr.M.K. Rath, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opp. Party

Mr.A.K. Beura,

Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

Order No.

ORDER

23.12.2021

03.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical Mode).

Mr. Satyanarayan Mishra, learned counsel

submits that he has been engaged as an advocate for

the informant by the High Court Legal Services

Committee. He files Vakalatanama in Court today.

The same be taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned counsel for the State as well as Mr. S.N.

Mishra, learned counsel for the informant.

This is an application under section 439 Cr.P.C.

in connection with C.T. Case No.21 of 2021 arising

out of Phulbani Sadar P.S. Case No.30 of 2021

pending in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge

-cum- Special Court (POCSO), Phulbani for offences

// 2 //

Page 2 of 2

punishable

u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top