Advocates:
['M/S DAYANANDA MOHAPATRA', '', 'D K SAHOO', 'M MOHAPATRA', 'S K SWAIN', 'B DASH', 'G R MOHAPATRA']

Page 1 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 1883 of 2005

Prakash Mishra

….

Petitioner

Mr. D. Mohapatra, Adv.

-Versus -

State of Odisha and others

….

Opposite Parties

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

20.12.2021

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to

quash Annexure-2, as the same has no application to the case

of the petitioner, and further seeks direction to the opposite

parties to hold that the petitioner is entitled to furnish the

revised option. He further seeks direction to the opposite

parties to accept the revised option and extend the

consequential service and financial benefits flowing out of

such acceptance of revised option within a stipulated time.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner

states that the petitioner has already made grievance to

opposite party no.2 under Annexure-1, which is pending for

consideration. Therefore, direction may be given to the

authority to take a decision on the same within a stipulated

time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection.

Order No.

01

Page 2 of 2

4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this

Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party

no.2 to take a decision on the grievance made by the petitioner

under Annexure-1 dated 22.05.1999, and pass appropriate in

accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably

within a period of three months from the date of receipt of

certified copy of this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)

Judge

Ashok