SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
V. Narasingh, J
SANJIT NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.6022 of 2018

Ashok Kumar Saudaray

….

Petitioner

Mr.A.K.Das, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opp.Pary

Mr.A.K.Nayak, A.S.C. for OPID

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA

Order No.

ORDER

23.08.2022

52

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode).

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the informant are directed to

file affidavit indicating therein the fact with regard to the agreement

entered with the builders and at what price the builder has agreed to

sell the plot/flats to the informants. Further they shall also indicate as

to how much money they have already paid to the builder and the

balance if any payable to the builder by the next date. Copy of such

affidavit be served in advance on the learned counsel for the

Petitioner.

3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner is also directed to file an

affidavit as to how many flats/plots are ready to be delivered

immediately on the next date.

4.

List this matter in the week commencing from 12.09.2022.

Interim order passed earlier shall continue till th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top