ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUBAL NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
WP(C) 16607/2022
Page 1 of 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO. 16607 of 2022
Subal Nayak
&.
Petitioner
Mr. Kapila Charan Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
&.
Opp. Parties
Mr. Pravakar Behera,
Standing Counsel
(For Transport Department)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
19.07.2022
1.
1.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
Petitioner in this writ petition prays for a direction to
send the Challan/VCR dated 10th April, 2021 in respect of the
vehicle bearing registration No.OR-09-D-1191 (Goods carrier)
to the jurisdictional Magistrate for appropriate relief. He further
prays for a direction to the Regional Transport Officer,
Nabarangapur to consider his case for issuance of fitness
certificate and permit.
3.
Mr. Behera, learned Standing Counsel for Transport
Department submits that in view of Section 194 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, the Petitioner is required to appear before
the Authority, who has issued the VCR and pray for
transmission of the record to the jurisdictional Magistrate, if it
wants to contest the case. The Petitioner has not yet appeared
before the authority and made such prayer. After amendment of
the MV Act, 1988, overloading is being treated rigidly. Since the
// 2 //
Page 2 of 3
Challan/VCR amount is Rs.29,500/-, the Petitioner may be
directed to deposit 50% of the same and contest the case before
the jurisdictional Magistrate. Mr. Behera, learned Standing
Counsel for Transport further submits that in view of the Road
Safety Committee constituted by the Hon9ble Supreme Court,
the driving license of the driver of the offending vehicle is liable
to be suspended. Hence, he prays that the Petitioner is required
to produce the driving license in original of the driver of the
offending vehicle for taking appropriate action.
4.
Taking into consideration the submissions of learned
counsel for the parties, this Court directs that without prejudice
to the case of either parties, in the event the Petitioner deposits a
sum of Rs.14,750/- (rupees fourteen thousand seven hundred
fifty only) before the R.T.O., Kendrapara-Opposite Party No.2
along with driving license of the driver of the offending vehicle
and on deposit being made, the Challan/VCR shall be
transmitted to the jurisdictional Magistrate for adjudication in
accordance with law. It is made clear that such deposit, if made,
as directed above, shall be subject to the result of the
adjudication to be made by the jurisdictional Magistrate.
5.
So far as issuance of fitness certificate and permit is
concerned, the Petitioner may apply for the same to the R.T.O.,
Kendrapara-Opposite Party by filing necessary application,
which shall be considered in accordance with law.
6.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ
petition is disposed of.
// 3 //
Page 3 of 3
7.
A copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this
order shall be served on Mr. Behera, learned Standing Counsel
for Transport Department for onward communication to the
Opposite Party.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper
application and on removal of defects.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
s.s.satapathy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.