SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUBAL KUMAR PANDA – Appellant
Versus
MEGHADEEPTI MIMANSITA MOHAPATRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['BHAGABAT PRASAD RATH', 'A NAYAK', 'L SAHU', 'S MISHRA', 'M/S B CH GHADEI', 'R B MISHRA', '', 'S K KANUNGO', 'B PR OJHA', 'R KU', 'SATAPATHY', 'P K PATRA', 'M/S P S NAYAK', 'S S MOHAPATRA', 'S HOTA', 'R BEHERA']

Page 1 of 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLREV No.351 of 2020

1. Subal Kumar Panda.

2. Minati Panda.

….

Petitioners

M/s. Bhagabat Prasad Rath, A. Nayak,

L. Sahu, S. Mishra, Advocates

-versus-

1. Meghadeepti Mimansita

Mohapatra.

2. Krishna Panda.

3. Subrat Kumar Panda.

4. Pranati Mohapatra.

….

Opposite Parties

M/s. B. Ch. Ghadei, R.B. Mishra, Advocates

(For Opp. Party Nos.1 and 2)

M/s. P.S. Nayak, S.S. Mohapatra, S. Hota, R. Behera,

Advocates (For Opp.Party Nos.3 and 4)

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI

Order

No.

ORDER

27.07.2021

11.

1.

The order dated 16.05.2019 passed by the

learned S.D.J.M., Balasore in D.V. Misc. Case No.122 of

2019, a proceeding under Section 12 of the Protection of

Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short <the

PWDV Act=) at the instance of the present opposite

party no.1 and confirmed by the learned 2nd Addl.

Sessions

Judge,

Balasore

vide

his

order

dated

// 2 //

Page 2 of 7

19.03.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.08/35 of

2020/2019 is sought to be quashed at the instance of

the revision-petitioners, who a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top