SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
NARAYAN PRASAD MOHANTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHARAMPA BRANCH – Respondent


Advocates:
['PRASANTA KUMAR SAHOO', '', 'U C DORA', 'G R DAS', 'S K DAS', 'B MOHANTY', 'M/S MANOJ KUMAR MOHAPATRA C B MOHAPATRA']

Page 1 of 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLREV No. 337 of 2022

Narayan Prasad Mohanty

&.

Petitioner

Mr. U.C. Dora, Advocate

-Versus -

State Bank of India, Charampa

Branch, Bhadrak & Another

&.

Opposite Parties

Mr. P. Tripathy,

Additional Standing Counsel

Mr. M.K. Mohapatra-1,

Advocate for Opposite Party No.1

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

ORDER_

08.12.2022

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section-

138 of the N.I. Act by judgment dated 14.08.2012 passed by the

learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Bhadrak in 1.C.C. Case No. 195

of 2009 and sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of six months and

pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the

complainant within a month failing which interest @ 10% p.a. will

be charged till payment is made.

3.

The facts of the case are that the petitioner is a lonee of the

respondent 3Bank having availed a personal loan of Rs.98,000/-

(Rupees Ninety-eight Thousand ) on 20.02.2007. On 13.02.2009, he

issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.41,522/-(Rupees Forty One

Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Two ) i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top