SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
RABINDRA BARIK – Appellant
Versus
GAJENDRA BARIK – Respondent


Page 1 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

C.M.P. No.1679 of 2017

Rabindra Barik

….

Petitioner(s)

Mr.J.K.Mishra-2,

Advocate

-versus-

Gajendra Barik & Ors.

….

Opposite Party(s)

Mr.B.C.Panda, Advocate

(O.P.No.1)

Mr.A.K.Mohanty, Advocate

(O.P.No.3)

Mr.U.R.Jena, Advocate

(O.P.No.2)

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

Order No.

ORDER

10.05.2022

05

1.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2.

Assailing the impugned order, Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for

the petitioner taking this Court to the objection filed herein to the Amin

Commission report read together with the cross examination by

defendant no.2, in cross examination himself has admitted that not only

he has not filed any rough report for consideration and not even taken

any fixed point in the measurement, it is in the above circumstance,

Mr.Mishra, learned counsel submitted that there is in fact no proper

report available to be considered in the final decree proceeding

involving a suit for partition. Thus, it is alleged that there has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top