ORISSA HIGH COURT
RABINDRA BARIK – Appellant
Versus
GAJENDRA BARIK – Respondent
Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
C.M.P. No.1679 of 2017
Rabindra Barik
….
Petitioner(s)
Mr.J.K.Mishra-2,
Advocate
-versus-
Gajendra Barik & Ors.
….
Opposite Party(s)
Mr.B.C.Panda, Advocate
(O.P.No.1)
Mr.A.K.Mohanty, Advocate
(O.P.No.3)
Mr.U.R.Jena, Advocate
(O.P.No.2)
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
Order No.
ORDER
10.05.2022
05
1.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2.
Assailing the impugned order, Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for
the petitioner taking this Court to the objection filed herein to the Amin
Commission report read together with the cross examination by
defendant no.2, in cross examination himself has admitted that not only
he has not filed any rough report for consideration and not even taken
any fixed point in the measurement, it is in the above circumstance,
Mr.Mishra, learned counsel submitted that there is in fact no proper
report available to be considered in the final decree proceeding
involving a suit for partition. Thus, it is alleged that there has been
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.