Advocates:
['M/S SUSANTA KU BARAL', '', 'S R PRADHAN', 'D MISHRA', 'A G A']

W.P.(C) No.14929 of 2015

11 01.08.2017 Heard Mr.Baral, learned counsel for the petiti

oner and Mr.Amit Patnaik, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

2. On the oral prayer of Mr.Baral, he is permitted to make necessary corr

ection in the consolidated cause title of the writ petition.

3. Challenge has been made to the inaction of the opposite party no.2 for

not repairing the channel for clear flow of the water to the agricultural land of the petitio

ner.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the pet

itioner, being a farmer, has got, land under Khata No.112 and 570 containing several plots. He

further submitted that the opposite parties are not maintaining the irrigation project proper

ly and thereby causing obstruction to the flow of water to the cultivable land of the petition

er. So, he submitted that the opposite party no.2 may be directed to take immediate steps for

supply of water by repairing the channel so that the petitioner can avail proper irrigation to

his agricultural property.

5. Mr.Patnaik, learned Addi