SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUSANTA KUMAR JENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUBHRANSU BHUSAN MOHANTY', '', 'S MOHAPATRA', 'D K PRADHAN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 24312 of 2021

Sri Susanta Kumar Jena

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. L. Samantaray, AGA

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA

JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Order No.

ORDER

03.09.2021

01.

The matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

Heard Mr. S.B. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Mr. L. Samantaray, learned Additional Government Advocate.

In this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer:-

“xxxx

xxx

xxx

(i) To admit this writ petition.

(ii) to quash the letter dated 28.01.2021issued by Tahasildar,

Dharmasala regarding imposition of fine and penalty of

Rs.7,21,360/- as ordered by the Collector which is a double

penalty for self same offence under O.M.M.C. Rules, 2016.

(iii) Or in alternative to direct the Revenue Divisional

Comissioner (Central) Cuttack (Appellate Authority under

O.M.M.C. Rules, 2016) to annual the order of Collector, Jajpur

Dtd. 22

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top