HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
RATNAKAR BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
WP(C) 24863/2021
['JYOTI PRAKASH DAS', '', 'S MISHRA', 'S DAS', 'M/S DAYANANDA MOHAPATRA', 'M MOHAPATRA', 'M R PRADHAN', 'J BARIK', 'P K SINGHDEO']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24863 of 2021
Ratnakar Behera
&&
Petitioner
Mr. Jyoti Prakash Das, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
&&
Opposite Parties
Mr. R.P. Mohapatra, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE C.R. DASH
ORDER
27.09.2021
Order No.
02.
1.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode).
2.
Heard Mr. Jyoti Prakash Das, learned counsel for the
petitioner,
learned
Additional
Government
Advocate
appearing for the Opposite Party No.1 and Mr. Dayananda
Mohapatra, learned counsel for the Opposite Parties 2 & 3-
Cuttack Development Authority.
3.
In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue
writ in the nature of certiorari/ mandamus directing the
Cuttack Development Authority to issue transfer application
form in his favour in respect of Plot No.13-3E/1083 in
2
Sectior-13 of Bidanasi Project Area and complete the
formalities of transfer of allotment within a stipulated period.
4.
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that though this Court in the case of Pravat Kumar Tripathy
3vrs.- C.D.A. and Another (in W.P.(C) No.4902 of 2015)
disposed of on 02.02.2015 and in the case of Krushna
Chandra Mohanty 3vr.- State of Orissa (in W.P.(C)
No.15398 of 2016) disposed of on 14.09.2016 has held that
meaning of date of lease-cum-sale of the plot is not the actual
date when the lease was executed by the authority; rather, the
relevant date of handing over possession of the piece of land
to the allottee, who in pursuance of the terms and conditions
deposited the money and allotment was made in his favour,
the Cuttack Development Authorities are not granting
permission for transfer of allotment of the aforesaid plot vide
Annexure-4 on the ground that, the transfer of Plot No.13-
3E/1083 in Sector-13 will be considered after construction of
building on the above plot.
5.
The sum and substance of the defence plea is that
Government of Odisha, Revenue and Disaster Management
Department vide order No.RDM-LRGEA-CTC-0014 2015
dated 21.11.2015 delegated the powers to accord permission
for transfer of leased out Government land allotted by CDA,
Cuttack to an individual allottee to another person by way of
sale, gift or mortgage. Ultimately, transfer of land vested with
3
Revenue
Divisional
Commissioner
(Central
Division),
Cuttack. It has been stipulated by the Government of Odisha
that in case of plots of land with houses built thereon taken
on lease-cum-sale basis from the CDA, the Revenue
Divisional Commissioner (Central Division), Cuttack shall
accord permission for transfer of the said land and house on
behalf of the Governor of Odisha, provided that two years9
time has expired from the date of lease-cum-sale of the plot in
question along with the house built thereon.
6.
It is, therefore, argued by Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra,
learned counsel for the C.D.A. that since the petitioner has not
constructed house on the said plot after purchased and the
lease-cum-sale deed having not been executed, the permission
for transfer of the land cannot be granted.
7.
It is brought to the notice of this Court that the plot in
question was initially allotted through lottery vide allotment
No.4472 dated 24.02.2007 in favour of petitioner. Though
allotment has been made on 24.02.2007 in favour petitioner
and more than 13 years have elapsed in the meantime, as yet,
the infrastructural development in Sector13 of Bidanasi
Project Area has not been completed. It is in fact not disputed
by the learned counsel for the C.D.A. that there has been
inordinate delay in developing the area of Sector-13 of
Bidanasi Project Area for several problems. So, decision taken
by the Government of Odisha that an original allotte