SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BIJAYA DAS@BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S SMRUTI RANJAN MOHAPATRA', '', 'M SUBUDHI', 'S HARICHANDAN', 'B R MOHANTY', 'S SAHOO', 'M K SWAIN', 'S MOHANTY', 'L PATTANAIK']

BLAPL No.4027 of 2017

02 08.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and t

he learned Additional Standing Counsel.

2. This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying for bail for the offe

nce under Sections 363/366/376(2)(n) of IPC read with Section 6 of POCSO Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsel

y implicated in this case, there is no direct material against him. There was love affair betw

een the victim and the petitioner and in the meantime they have married. He further submits th

at the victim girl denied to be examined by the doctor for which the petitioner may be release

d on bail on any condition as deemed just and proper. Learned Additional Standing Counsel oppo

ses the prayer for bail.

4. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, reg

ard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case including the statement of the witnes

ses and other police papers, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like am

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top