SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MANORANJAN SUNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


BLAPL No.108 of 2016

12.5.2016

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State

.

This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with G.R. Case

No.918 of 2015 arising out of Bolangir Town P.S. Case No.417 of 2015 pending in the Court of l

earned S.D.J.M., Bolangir for alleged commission of offences punishable under sections 366/323

/376/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner moved an application for bail before the Court of learned Addit

ional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Vigilance), Bolangir which was rejected on 21.12.2015.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in c

ustody since 05.12.2015 and he has been charge sheeted under sections 366/323/376/506/34 of th

e Indian Penal Code. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the v

ictim is a consenting party and she moved with the petitioner from place to place and also sta

yed with the petitioner in the house of one Arun Tandi and the ingredients of the offences are

not attracted. He further submits that the medical examination report of the victi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top